But what if there is so much data that it does not fit into an application such as Excel? Or there are multiple users that want to access this information. Maybe this information needs to be updated? In this case databases come into play. It is impossible to build a commonly used web site on Excel. There are closed and open source database solutions out there. Selection of a product depends on the price to pay and experience that is available with a specific product. I will just list here what I know, but it is up to your skill set to pick one or another. Commonly used databases are: MSSQL, Oracle, IBM DB2, MySQL, Postgres.
One common issue that any database will experience as the data in it grows. It will become slower. To avoid this issue there are a few options.
Cache what is commonly used. There are solutions out there that will cache the data for you.
Scale-up. Get better performing hardware. A system with better CPU and more memory will perform better (it depends if your database is capable of using more than one CPU and more memory, generally they are). Some of them need to be configured separately to use more memory.
Scale horizontally. Adding more machines. It depends if your database can support multiple machines.
Simplify the relationships. Many of the commonly used database solutions offer building relationships for you. For example: A website which holds customers orders information. In order to do so it needs data such as:
Customer record
Current order
Past orders
( Of course I am simplifying things. There are a lot more tables needed to support e-commerce web sites. )
These tables need relations built into them to know who had purchased what, and what that person is buying now.
As the data grows, the web site will become slower. There are a few computing solutions to address this issue.
Use a caching solution. Cache commonly used information. Good candidates for that are the homepage of the web site, product pages.
Build indexes. Without indexes a data need to be scanned to be found.
Get a different database that is not so slow with the amount of data. It is not an easy task to migrate the data over to a new database. Careful planning and testing needs to be done.
Some data can be cached - stored temporarily in computers memory. What is the benefit of it? Cached data is accessed faster than non cached data. Of course the logic needs to be more complex in this case: some data will come from a database and some from cache. A database itself may have a caching layer built into it. Please check with your database vendor if the caching layer is part of the database solution. How good is it?
If the data is not in cache maybe it needs to be added there?
There are two options to improve response time: scale vertically or scale horizontally. Scale vertically means getting faster hardware, scale horizontally means getting more hardware. An application needs to supports scaling horizontally.
Use a different database. Most common databases are relational databases. These are much slower than non-relational databases.
Example of relationship is: a customer record is tied to customer order record this linkage is done at the database level. Each time relationship is verified the load will be placed on a database server.
In a non-relational database this linkage is performed by an application, therefore it makes database much faster.
YouTube video 1/2
YouTube video 2/2
Database Fundamentals: Performance and Scaling Review
Review Questions:
Why are databases necessary for many modern applications, especially those accessible by multiple users or containing large amounts of data?
What are the key considerations when choosing a database solution, and what are some examples of commonly used database systems?
Explain why a database might become slower as the amount of data it stores increases.
Describe the concept of caching in the context of database performance. What types of data are good candidates for caching?
What does it mean to "scale up" a database system? What are the potential benefits and limitations of this approach?
Explain the concept of "scaling horizontally" for a database. What is a key requirement for a database to support horizontal scaling?
How do relationships between data tables impact database performance, particularly as data volume grows? Provide an example of a database relationship.
What is the purpose of database indexes? How do they contribute to improved query performance?
What is the fundamental difference in how data relationships are handled in relational databases compared to non-relational databases, and how does this affect performance?
What are the trade-offs involved in migrating data to a different database system to improve performance?
Answer Key:
Databases are necessary when data volume exceeds the capacity of applications like spreadsheets, when multiple users need concurrent access, and when data needs frequent updates. They provide a structured and managed way to store, retrieve, and manipulate information, which is essential for dynamic web applications.
Key considerations when choosing a database include the cost of the solution (open source vs. commercial), the availability of expertise with a specific product, and the specific performance and scalability requirements of the application. Examples of commonly used databases include MSSQL, Oracle, IBM DB2, MySQL, and Postgres.
As the data in a database grows, the system has to process and search through a larger volume of information for each query. This increased workload can lead to longer query execution times and overall slower performance if optimization strategies are not implemented.
Caching involves storing frequently accessed data in a faster memory location (the cache) to reduce the need to retrieve it from the slower main database every time. Good candidates for caching are frequently viewed, relatively static data like website homepages or product details.
Scaling up (vertical scaling) involves upgrading the existing hardware of the database server with more powerful components such as a faster CPU and more RAM. This can improve performance if the database software is capable of utilizing the additional resources, but it has limitations in terms of cost and the maximum available hardware.
Scaling horizontally involves adding more machines (servers) to distribute the database workload across multiple systems. For a database to support horizontal scaling, it needs to be designed with architectures that allow for data partitioning and coordination across multiple nodes.
Relationships between data tables in relational databases require the database to perform checks and joins across these tables to retrieve related information. As data grows, the complexity and cost of these operations increase, potentially slowing down query performance. An example is the relationship between a "Customer record" and "Current order" records, linked by a customer ID.
Database indexes are data structures that improve the speed of data retrieval operations on a database table. Similar to an index in a book, they allow the database to quickly locate specific rows without having to scan the entire table, significantly speeding up queries.
In relational databases, relationships between data are typically defined and enforced at the database level through foreign keys and join operations, which can become performance bottlenecks with large datasets. In non-relational databases, these linkages are often handled within the application logic, potentially making data retrieval faster as the database has less relationship management overhead.
Migrating data to a different database can offer significant performance improvements if the new database is better suited to the data volume and access patterns. However, it is a complex and potentially risky process requiring careful planning, data transformation, thorough testing, and potential application code changes, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.
Essay Format Questions:
Discuss the trade-offs between scaling up and scaling horizontally a database system to address performance degradation due to data growth. Under what circumstances might one approach be preferred over the other?
Explain the role of caching in improving database performance. Describe different levels or types of caching that can be implemented in conjunction with a database system, and discuss their respective benefits and complexities.
Compare and contrast relational and non-relational database systems in terms of how they handle data relationships and the implications this has for performance and scalability, particularly in the context of large datasets.
Analyze the various strategies for mitigating database slowdowns as data volume increases, including caching, indexing, scaling, and database migration. Evaluate the effectiveness and challenges associated with each approach.
Consider a hypothetical e-commerce website experiencing performance issues as its customer base and order history grow. Based on the concepts discussed in the source material, propose a multi-faceted approach to address these issues, justifying your recommendations.
Glossary of Key Terms:
Database: An organized collection of structured information, typically stored electronically in a computer system. Databases are designed to allow for efficient storage, retrieval, and management of data.
Open Source Database: A database management system whose source code is available to the public for use, modification, and distribution, typically without licensing fees.
Closed Source Database: A database management system whose source code is proprietary and not publicly available. Users typically need to purchase a license to use it.
Scaling Up (Vertical Scaling): Improving the performance of a single database server by upgrading its hardware components, such as CPU, RAM, and storage.
Scaling Horizontally: Distributing the database workload and data across multiple interconnected servers or nodes to improve performance and handle increased capacity.
Caching: Temporarily storing frequently accessed data in a faster memory location (the cache) to reduce the latency of retrieving it from the slower primary storage (e.g., the database).
Index: A data structure that improves the speed of data retrieval operations on a database table. It allows the database to quickly locate specific rows without scanning the entire table.
Relational Database: A type of database that stores and provides access to data points that are related to one another. Relationships are defined and enforced at the database level, often using tables with rows and columns.
Non-Relational Database (NoSQL Database): A type of database that does not use the tabular schema of relational databases. These databases are often used for large, distributed datasets and can handle unstructured or semi-structured data. Relationships between data are often handled within the application.
Data Migration: The process of transferring data between different data storage systems, data formats, or computer systems. In the context of databases, this often involves moving data from one database platform to another.
Questions & Answers
Q1: Why are databases necessary for many modern applications, especially web sites?
Databases become essential when dealing with large amounts of data that exceed the capacity of applications like spreadsheets, or when multiple users need concurrent access, or when data needs to be frequently updated. For example, building a functional and commonly used website is impossible with a tool like Excel due to these limitations. Databases provide a structured way to store, manage, and retrieve information efficiently in such scenarios.
Q2: What are some common relational database management systems (RDBMS) mentioned, and what factor often influences the choice between them?
The sources list several commonly used relational database management systems, including MSSQL, Oracle, IBM DB2, MySQL, and Postgres. The selection of a specific database product often depends on the price of the solution and the available expertise within a team or organization for a particular system.
Q3: As the amount of data in a database grows, what is a common performance issue that arises, and what are the primary strategies to mitigate this?
A common issue as data volume increases in a database is a decrease in performance, leading to slower query response times. The sources outline several strategies to address this, including: caching frequently accessed data, scaling up (improving hardware like CPU and memory), scaling horizontally (adding more machines), simplifying database relationships, and building indexes on frequently queried columns.
Q4: What is data caching, and how does it improve database performance?
Data caching involves storing frequently used information temporarily in a computer's memory. The primary benefit of caching is faster data access compared to retrieving it directly from the database. This can significantly improve the response time of applications that rely on this data, such as frequently visited web pages or product details. However, it also introduces complexity in managing data consistency between the cache and the underlying database.
Q5: What is the difference between scaling up (vertical scaling) and scaling horizontally, and what is a key requirement for horizontal scaling to be effective?
Scaling up, or vertical scaling, involves improving the performance of the existing hardware by upgrading components like the CPU or increasing memory. Scaling horizontally involves adding more machines to distribute the workload. For horizontal scaling to be effective, the database system and the application utilizing it must be designed to support the distribution of data and processing across multiple machines.
Q6: How do indexes improve database query performance?
Without indexes, a database system typically needs to scan the entire dataset to locate specific information that matches a query. Building indexes on specific columns creates a separate data structure that allows the database to quickly locate the relevant data without performing a full table scan, significantly speeding up data retrieval.
Q7: What is the fundamental difference highlighted between relational and non-relational databases in terms of handling relationships and its impact on performance?
Relational databases typically define and enforce relationships between data tables at the database level. For example, linking customer records to their orders. Each time these relationships are verified, it places a load on the database server. In contrast, non-relational databases often handle these linkages within the application logic rather than at the database level. This shifting of responsibility can make non-relational databases faster, particularly when dealing with large volumes of data where numerous relationship verifications might slow down a relational database.
Q8: What considerations are important if an organization decides to migrate from one database system to another to address performance issues related to data growth?
Migrating data to a new database system is presented as a significant undertaking. It requires careful planning and thorough testing to ensure data integrity and application compatibility with the new database. This is not a simple task and needs to be approached strategically to avoid data loss or application downtime.
Comments
Post a Comment