Mutable and immutable objects in programming

Mutable means that the object can change. For example if a speed of a car is 55, than it is possible to change it to 65. Mutable objects are variables. Variables take space in a computer memory.

Immutable objects are constants. For example it possible to define a constant that represents maximum speed. Constants don't take space in a computer memory, at compile time a constant is replaced with an associated value.

There are three reasons why constants are used:

1. Improved readability. It makes more sense to use a constant which name is maximum_speed rather then 65. A person who writes code needs to come up with meaningful names for variables and constants and not just a, b, c.

2. Value of a constant can be easily changed at a later time. For example if the height of the highest building is 100, but a new one was built that is higher than the previous one, than it is possible to update the constant with a new value just once, rather then update multiple times, if a constant is not used.

3. Same result can be achieved with variables, however constants are much faster than variables. At compile time constants replaced with their value however variables are stored in a computer memory.

YouTube video

Mutable and Immutable Objects Study Guide

Quiz

Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 complete sentences.

Define a mutable object, and provide an example of a mutable object.

Explain what happens to a mutable object in computer memory.

Define an immutable object, and give an example of an immutable object.

Describe how an immutable object is handled at compile time.

State the first benefit of using constants over variables and why that is helpful.

Describe the second advantage of using constants, specifically in relation to modification.

Why are constants more efficient than variables?

What is the disadvantage of not using descriptive names for variables and constants?

Explain how using a constant can reduce the chance of errors in code.

Is the speed of a car a mutable or an immutable object, and why?

Quiz Answer Key

A mutable object is one that can be changed after it is created. For example, the speed of a car can be considered a mutable object as it can be increased or decreased.

Mutable objects, like variables, are allocated space in computer memory, allowing for their values to be modified throughout the program's execution.

An immutable object is one whose value cannot be changed after it is defined. An example is a constant, like a maximum speed limit, which is intended to remain fixed throughout the program.

Immutable objects, or constants, are replaced with their associated value at compile time, meaning they do not occupy space in computer memory during runtime.

The first benefit of using constants is that they improve readability. They allow programmers to use meaningful names like maximum_speed instead of just numeric values, making the code easier to understand.

Another advantage of constants is that their value can be easily changed later. If the constant's value needs to be updated, it only needs to be changed in one place, instead of multiple places throughout a program if a variable was used.

Constants are more efficient than variables because they are replaced with their value during the compile time process. This results in faster execution as the computer does not have to look up their value in memory at runtime.

The disadvantage of not using descriptive names for variables and constants is that it makes the code harder to read and understand, which is problematic to debug and maintain.

Using constants reduces errors by ensuring a value that needs to remain the same stays the same throughout the program, avoiding inconsistencies and the potential for unintended changes.

The speed of a car is a mutable object because its value can be altered after it has been assigned an initial value.

Essay Questions

Discuss the implications of using mutable objects when designing and implementing a large-scale software application, focusing on potential issues and mitigation strategies.

Compare and contrast the use cases for mutable and immutable objects, providing scenarios where each would be most appropriate and explaining the rationale.

Explain how the concept of immutability contributes to the safety and reliability of a program, particularly in scenarios involving multiple parts of a program accessing and modifying shared data.

Analyze the impact of compile-time substitution of constants on the performance and efficiency of a program, focusing on the benefits and drawbacks.

Critically evaluate the trade-offs between the increased flexibility of using variables versus the enhanced readability and efficiency provided by constants in programming.

Glossary of Key Terms

Mutable Object: An object whose state or value can be modified after it is created.

Immutable Object: An object whose state or value cannot be changed after it is created.

Variable: A named storage location in a computer's memory that holds a value, which can be changed during program execution.

Constant: A named value that is fixed or unchanging and is usually defined during the compile time.

Compile Time: The stage of program development where source code is translated into machine code.

Runtime: The stage when a program is actively executing on a computer.

Readability: The ease with which a program's code can be understood by a human reader.

Memory Allocation: The process of assigning a portion of computer memory for storage purposes.

Frequently Asked Questions: Mutable vs. Immutable Objects

What is the core difference between mutable and immutable objects in programming? Mutable objects are those whose state can be modified after they are created. They occupy space in computer memory and can be changed directly, like a car's speed which can be altered. Conversely, immutable objects, also known as constants, cannot be altered after their creation. They are placeholders for values that are determined at compile time and don’t take up space in memory like variables. They are replaced by their values directly during compilation.

Can you provide examples of mutable and immutable objects in a real-world context? A good analogy for a mutable object would be a car. Its speed, color, or location can all change over time. An example of an immutable object would be a maximum speed limit defined for a specific road; while the limit itself can change over time by modifying the code, the limit is fixed once defined, as a constant with a specific value in the code. It’s not changing within the program as it runs, but is replaced by its set value during compilation.

Why is readability an important consideration when deciding whether to use a variable or a constant? Using well-named constants, such as maximum_speed instead of a raw number like 65, makes code far more understandable and easier to maintain. This allows programmers to focus on the logic of the code rather than having to decipher the meaning of arbitrary numbers scattered throughout. A clear, descriptive name attached to a value greatly improves readability.

How does using constants simplify code maintenance? Constants centralize values that may need to change later. For example, if the height of the highest building were used multiple times in a codebase, a constant such as highest_building_height could be used to represent it instead of the number itself. If the height changed, you'd only need to update the value of the constant in one place, rather than searching and changing the value in multiple places in the program’s code, which is far less error-prone.

Are constants used for the same reasons as variables? Both variables and constants can hold values within a program; however they are used in very different ways. Variables store mutable values that change during a program's runtime, while constants represent immutable values that are established during compile time. Variables are designed for flexibility, while constants are designed for stability and clarity in code, as well as potential performance advantages.

How do constants affect program performance compared to variables? Constants are generally faster than variables. During compile time, constants are replaced with their associated values, eliminating the need to look them up in memory during the program’s execution. Variables, on the other hand, need to be accessed from their memory locations every time they are used. This direct replacement of constants results in faster program execution as accessing memory for a value is avoided.

Do constants store values in the computer's memory like variables? No, constants don’t take up space in memory in the same way variables do. Instead, during the compilation of a program, constants are directly replaced with their defined values. This is a key distinction, because variable values must be read from their memory location at runtime.

If a variable and a constant can both represent "the maximum speed," what distinguishes them conceptually and practically? While both can hold a value representing "the maximum speed," a variable is a mutable value that can be changed during the program’s execution. In contrast, a constant is an immutable value representing the maximum speed which cannot be changed during the execution of the program, and is substituted for its value during compilation. In terms of practicality, if you expect the maximum speed to remain constant through the execution of the program, you should use a constant to improve code readability and efficiency. If there is a chance that a value could change at runtime, such as a user-adjusted speed in a game, then a variable would be more suitable.